1184 founders, operators, and GTM leaders engaged with Battery Ventures’ content across 33 recent posts — the company page plus partners Bill Binch, Danel Dayan, and Lior Mallul. This is who they are — names, titles, and the companies they work for.
Real names. Real titles. Real companies. Click any card to open their LinkedIn profile. Search by name, title, or company — filter by reaction type.
These engagers show up across 3+ posts in the window — a 30-day snapshot. They’re not casual scrollers: they’re portfolio founders, CROs from the dinner series, CISOs from Black Hat, and operators who track the fund closely. Highest-trust relationships in the dataset.
Engagement clusters by employer — when multiple people from one company engage, that’s an account-level signal, not a bunch of unrelated likes.
Company pages that engaged, by follower count (log scale). Battery’s content pulls enterprise giants and micro-brands alike.
When multiple people — especially senior people — from one company engage, that’s an account signal, not a stray like. Ranked by engagers, seniority, and repeat engagement.
Do people engage with Battery’s ideas, or with its news? Partner POVs and fund announcements pull different crowds — here’s who shows up for each.
10 of 33 posts is partner point-of-view (dinners, panels, reflections) — the volume play. Fund news is the reach play: the Series C and the Arize exit pulled more likes than all POV posts combined. The lever is packaging POV around announcement moments.
Blue = thought leadership · Purple = announcements. Partner POV pulled 920 likes — fund news pulled 8236.
115 comments from 108 people. A comment is a name in public — the strongest engagement signal of all.
Battery Ventures backs technology companies across software, infrastructure, and industrial tech. Its content pulls a specific crowd: founders, GTM leaders, security executives, and AI operators — the people who build, buy, and fund what Battery backs. Here’s how its 1184 engagers break down.
Reaction mix tells you the *type* of attention Battery’s content gets. The repeat rate tells you who’s actually paying attention vs. passively scrolling.
33 posts analyzed (Jul 27 – Aug 27, 2026). Fund news, portfolio exits, and the partner event series pull the highest engagement.
This isn’t a list of likes. It’s a map of commercially relevant relationships forming in public — and most of them aren’t being worked.
The question isn’t whether people engage with Battery’s content. It’s who’s engaging that nobody’s working.
Data is only as good as the decision it changes. Here’s the same analysis, read two ways.
This is a live map of Battery’s orbit. 1184 named people, including 165 founders/CEOs, 138 C-suite, and 162 VPs/Directors — the founders, operators, and GTM leaders Battery already reaches, ranked by company and seniority.
Dynatrace is the account to watch — 12 engagers, 4 senior. And 77% of the audience matches the Battery ICP, yet the fund isn’t converting that attention into sourced pipeline. Whoever works these relationships first, wins them.
Your fund’s content already reaches your buyers — 77% of engagers are founders, GTM leaders, and operators. Dynatrace’s 12 engagers (the Arize acquirer) and the CRO dinner series show the customer-content flywheel working; those are the relationships to double down on.
148 people engage with 2+ of the four profiles — your committed core doing diligence. Prioritize them first. Comments show GTM leaders and CISOs engaging organically. The one gap: only 10 of 33 posts is partner point-of-view — the relationship layer already exists; the next lever is converting it into sourced pipeline.