Who’s engaging with
GTMfund
772 founders, GTM operators, LPs, and investors engaged with GTMfund’s content across 7 recent posts. This is who they are — names, titles, and the companies they work for.
772 people who showed up
Real names. Real titles. Real companies. Click any card to open their LinkedIn profile. Search by name, title, or company — filter by reaction type.
49 people engage with almost everything the fund posts
These engagers show up across 3+ posts in the window — a 30-day snapshot. They’re not casual scrollers: they’re the fund’s team, its ecosystem, and operators who track GTMfund closely. Highest-trust relationships in the dataset.
The companies showing up most
Engagement clusters by employer — when multiple people from one company engage, that’s an account-level signal, not a bunch of unrelated likes.
Company pages that engaged, by follower count (log scale). The fund’s content pulls enterprise giants and micro-brands alike.
The account-level opportunities
When multiple people — especially senior people — from one company engage, that’s an account signal, not a stray like. Ranked by engagers, seniority, and repeat engagement.
Thought leadership vs. announcements
Do people engage with the fund’s ideas, or with its news? The feed is overwhelmingly announcements — and the one thought-leadership essay still drew attention.
1 of 7 posts is thought leadership. The rest are events, roles, and portfolio news — so this audience isn’t being given much to think with. That’s the untapped lever.
Blue = thought leadership · Purple = announcements. The single essay pulled 18 likes — and the Chris Lee podcast post (an announcement) pulled 862 across its announcement posts.
The comments reveal the relationship
86 comments from 66 people. A comment is a name in public — the strongest engagement signal of all.
102 people engage with both GTMfund and Sophie Buonassisi
This overlap is the inner ecosystem — the people who track the fund and its SVP’s personal brand. They’re the highest-trust relationships in either dataset.
Who is this network — and does it fit your ICP?
GTMfund is the VC fund backing B2B GTM founders. Its content pulls a specific crowd: founders, GTM operators, LPs, and the portfolio companies building in that ecosystem. Here’s how its 772 engagers break down.
How the network engages
Reaction mix tells you the *type* of attention GTMfund’s content gets. The repeat rate tells you who’s actually paying attention vs. passively scrolling.
The content that built this network
7 posts analyzed (Jul 17 – Aug 11, 2026). Fund news, portfolio milestones, and GTMnow episodes pull the highest engagement.
Four angles worth acting on
This isn’t a list of likes. It’s a map of commercially relevant relationships forming in public — and most of them aren’t being worked.
The question isn’t whether people engage with GTMfund’s content. It’s who’s engaging that nobody’s working.
What you’d actually do with this
Data is only as good as the decision it changes. Here’s the same analysis, read two ways.
This is a live map of GTMfund’s orbit. 772 named people, 122 founders/CEOs, 37 C-suite/GPs, and 81 VPs/Directors — the B2B GTM decision-makers are already here, ranked by company and seniority.
Deel is the account to watch — 128 engagers, 16 senior. And 77% of the audience matches a GTM profile, yet the fund isn’t converting that attention. Whoever works these relationships first, wins them.
Your content already reaches your own pipeline — 77% of engagers are founders, VCs, GTM leaders, or LPs. Deel’s 128 engagers prove the portfolio-content flywheel works; that’s the relationship to double down on.
102 people engage with both the fund and Sophie — your committed core. Prioritize them first. Comments show LP pride and portfolio hiring happening organically. The one gap: only 1 of 7 posts is thought leadership — the feed is announcement-heavy, and that’s the untapped lever.