Who’s engaging with
OpenAI & Colin Fleming
574 founders, operators, VCs, and AI builders engaged with OpenAI’s company feed and Colin Fleming’s posts across 35 recent posts. This is who they are — names, titles, and the companies they work for.
574 people who showed up
Real names. Real titles. Real companies. Click any card to open their LinkedIn profile. Search by name, title, or company — filter by reaction type.
20 people engage across 3+ posts in the combined feeds
These engagers show up across 3+ posts in the 30-day window — they’re not casual scrollers. They’re OpenAI’s team, its ecosystem, and operators who track the AI market closely. Highest-trust relationships in the dataset.
The companies showing up most
Engagement clusters by employer — when multiple people from one company engage, that’s an account-level signal, not a bunch of unrelated likes.
The account-level opportunities
When multiple people — especially senior people — from one company engage, that’s an account signal, not a stray like. Ranked by engagers, seniority, and repeat engagement.
Thought leadership vs. announcements
Do people engage with the ideas, or with the news? 7 of 35 posts are thought leadership — and the essays still pulled attention.
7 of 35 posts are thought leadership (Colin’s essays on frontier intelligence, cybersecurity backlogs, and idea meritocracy). The rest are launches, events, and news — so this audience isn’t being given much to think with. That’s the untapped lever.
Blue = thought leadership · Purple = announcements. 881 avg likes per essay vs 837 per announcement — announcements scale with reach, essays build the relationship.
The comments reveal the relationship
619 comments from 367 people (top 20 per post). A comment is a name in public — the strongest engagement signal of all.
Who is this network — and does it fit your ICP?
OpenAI’s company feed and Colin Fleming’s posts pull overlapping crowds: AI builders, GTM leaders, founders, and investors. Here’s how the 574 combined engagers break down.
How the network engages
Reaction mix tells you the *type* of attention this content gets. The repeat rate tells you who’s actually paying attention vs. passively scrolling.
The content that built this network
35 posts analyzed (Jul 19 – Aug 19, 2026): 25 from OpenAI’s company feed, 10 from Colin Fleming’s profile. Product launches and customer stories pull the highest engagement.
Four angles worth acting on
This isn’t a list of likes. It’s a map of commercially relevant relationships forming in public — and most of them aren’t being worked.
The question isn’t whether people engage with OpenAI’s content. It’s who’s engaging that nobody’s working.
What you’d actually do with this
Data is only as good as the decision it changes. Here’s the same analysis, read two ways.
This is a live map of the AI market’s attention. 574 named people, 60 founders/CEOs, 20 C-suite, and 43 VPs/Directors — the decision-makers are already here, ranked by company and seniority.
Servicenow is the account to watch — 5 engagers, 2 senior. And 43% of the audience matches a GTM profile, yet that attention isn’t being routed anywhere. Whoever works these relationships first, wins them.
OpenAI’s feed and Colin’s profile reach the same core — 19 people engage with both. That’s your committed audience: the AI builders and buyers who follow the company and its marketing voice.
25 company posts and 10 profile posts in 30 days. Company posts carry the news; Colin’s posts carry the narrative. The overlap is where influence compounds — and it’s measurable, named, and one click from a conversation.